Content Feed
About
Christopher Tipper is a free-lance software developer and writer with a deep interest in economic, political and social affairs.
Born and brought up overseas, of English parents, he has lived in Iran, Zaïre, Lebanon, and Greece. He settled in England in 2000.
Educated at Charterhouse and Imperial College, his chief intellectual influence has been Karl Popper and his defense of an open society against absolutism and dogma.
Of course there has to be a point-of-view, and the opinions on this website are geared towards promoting free debate, puncturing unsound ideas and questioning received wisdom.
 |
 |
 |
OWING TO other commitments e-conomist will be taking an indefinite break. These are just some of the highlights from previous years that are still of some interest and that I am particularly proud of.
A review of Chris Patten’s autobiographical excursion on the European Union and its place in the world. I take issue with him on a number of grounds including policy towards Turkey, democratic accountability in the EU and the Iraq conflict. I found Chris Patten an excellent apologist for the middle-European consensus but in the end found the book’s arguments unconvincing. Go to article...
An examination of Steven Pinker’s thoughts on cognitive and evolutionary psychology after I had read “How the Mind Works” and “The Blank Slate”. Steven Pinker is a very eloquent author who has some interesting things to say about human nature and the history of research in psychology. However, he has taken evolution altogether too seriously and doesn’t seem to understand the creative side of human psychology very well. Go to article...
This article followed a BBC Newsnight special report on a school in East London that had been forced to embrace a programme of “synthetic phonics” to tackle a serious problem with illiteracy. This article argues that educational academics should take the scientific method seriously rather than advocating the latest politically correct nostrum in teaching methods. Go to article...
In 2004, Bill Emmott, the then-departing editor of The Economist, published a book on geopolitics in the 21st century, “20:21 Vision”. It was a thoughtful and thought provoking book that sparked a number of ideas. My review of it is to be found in Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3.
A short and pithy piece I wrote in the aftermath of the crash-landing of Britain’s pathetic attempt to conquer the Red Planet. Bad haircuts, pop musicians and a clean-room in the back of a van. Where did it all go wrong? Go to article...
“Culture and Anarchy” by Matthew Arnold is one of the classics of 19th Century political writing. Simon Heffer decided to co-opt it in his Radio 4 attack on the modern welfare state and this article explains why he fell far short of Arnold’s example. Go to article...
This essay was an attempt to inject some historical perspective into Lords reform by making a case for checks-and-balances within the framework of representative government. It outlines a key episode in the history of the Peloponnesian War to show how the pure democratic experiment of ancient Greece failed through lack of a check on the majority. The article then examines the US Constitution and explains why it has proven so resilient over the last 200 years. My personal solution to a fully-elected upper-chamber is provided, but it is not really the main point of the essay. Go to article...
It is has long been my contention that democracy is a living ideal and that it must constantly be defended and re-invigorated if it is not to crumble into tyranny. Many people take it for granted in this country, but I wonder how many of us could make a spirited defence of it in the areas of the world where it is poorly understood and quite frequently misunderstood by even its most fervent advocates. This is a 900-word vaccination for those whose democratic immune-system needs a boost. Go to article...
Written in 1999 and published in the Athens News this article is still relevant. The RIAA is still trying to prosecute its customers and nine years later online music is still in its infancy. The RIAA should have read my article. Go to article...
Utilitarianism is a creed which refuses to die. I wrote this article, at
the age of twenty, that demolished Utilitarianism as a rational system of
morals. It seemed obvious to me that the doctrine of the ‘ends justifies
the means’ that Utilitarianism metamorphosed into was morally bankrupt
and that no intelligent person could espouse such a flawed philosophy after
all these years. But it remains the most popular article on this site. Maybe
it appeals to Google’s sense of humour. Go to article... 